The decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania: Philipp Kirkorov will not be able to enter Lithuania for five years.
The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania has examined the dispute according to the complaint of the Russian performer Philipp Kirkorov on the prohibition of the Migration Department to enter Lithuania for five years.
The Court found that the Migration Department had reasonably assessed the actions of a known performer as a threat to state security. The Court made the conclusion after evaluating the arguments of the Migration Department that, being a popular performer due to his active concert and organizational activities, Philipp Kirkorov influences various levels of society that can be seen as a tool for spreading Russian “soft power”. The Russian Federation exploits the performer to justify its aggressive foreign policy and negatively indoctrinate the population of the Republic of Lithuania, while he supports the occupation policy of the Russian Federation by his own example and deliberate actions.
An Attorney of Vilnius Law Firm SPES represented the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the case.
The agent has the right to conclude a transaction with himself/herself on behalf of the principal provided that this does not harm the interests of the principal.

We are happy with the lawsuit won by the Attorney of the Law Firm after having successfully defended the interests of the client who was sued for annulment of the transaction. Acting under the power of attorney, the client of the Firm entered into a transaction with himself on behalf of another person, but in order to benefit his principal.
In the case, the Court presented the conditions of Article 2.134 (1) of the Civil Code providing that an agent may not conclude contracts in principal’s name either with himself or with a person, whom he represents at the given time, as well as his spouse, parents, children or other close relatives.
The Court clarified that transactions entered into by the agent in breach of the Article 2.134 (1) of the Civil Code are disputed but not void transactions. Such transaction can be challenged only after having established a set of legally significant circumstances: (i) the opposition of the transaction concluded by the representative to the interests of the principal; (ii) the operation of the agent in breach of the rights granted; (iii) third party knowledge or need to know about a conflict of interest. Thus, the Court clarified that a transaction may be declared invalid on the grounds if it actually harms the interests of the principal, the principal did not seek such a transaction and the third party with whom the transaction was concluded was dishonest.

  • APRIL 2022

    The Court ruled on the tenant's obligation to pay rent during the quarantine period. The team of Vilnius Law Firm SPES defended the interests of the client - the company operating the shopping centre - in a dispute with the tenant who evaded the payment of rent and marketing tax. The tenant of the premises argued that it should be exempted from paying the ...

  • FEBRUARY 2022

    The team of Vilnius Law Firm SPES represented the client in the acquisition of one of the largest shopping centres in Northern Lithuania - 18.500 sq. m. area Panevėžys shopping and entertainment centre “Babilonas”. We are happy with the client development and the opportunity to contribute to their success. More information about the transaction:http...

  • JANUARY 2022

    The cost of action by a disloyal leader is the award of all wrongly earned funds. The Kaunas Regional Court has examined the dispute between the Lithuanian Powerlifting Federation and its former President. The Federation applied to the Court by questioning the honesty and loyalty of the former President in organising the European Powerlifting Championships...

  • OCTOBER 2021

    The dishonest managers of the bankrupt company have been held liable for the company’s bankruptcy. The Attorney at Law of Vilnius Law Firm SPES who represented the creditors of the bankrupt company was able to prove that the company was bankrupt by intentional dishonest actions of its former managers.The Attorney at Law collected the evidence and rev...

  • JULY 2021

    The administrative court reinstated the illegally dismissed environmentalist The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court annulled the illegal orders of the Director of the Department of Environmental Protection under the Ministry of Environment regarding the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the head of the Regional Environmental Inspectorate and reins...