The cost of action by a disloyal leader is the award of all wrongly earned funds.
The Kaunas Regional Court has examined the dispute between the Lithuanian Powerlifting Federation and its former President. The Federation applied to the Court by questioning the honesty and loyalty of the former President in organising the European Powerlifting Championships.
The Kaunas Regional Court found the doubts of the Federation to be justified after finding that the President had benefited from the organised Championship without informing the Executive Committee and acting through another entity under his control, i. e., he earned the income to his managed sports club the Federation could have earned.
The Court found that the transfer of profitable activities from the Federation to an entity under his control was incompatible with the standards of loyalty and honesty applicable to the President. By raising his Personal interest over the interest of the Federation, the President caused damage to the Federation in the form of lost income that the Court awarded to the Federation.
The Attorney-at-Law of Vilnius Law Firm SPES represented the Federation in this case.
The Law Firm’s client accused of illegal enrichment has been acquitted.
The Kaunas Regional Court acquitted the client represented by the Law Firm who has been accused of illegal enrichment.
After having assessed the data on the accused person’s income and expenses since 1981, the fact that the accused person worked all his life and had businesses, his age, non-bank savings, and concluded civil transactions (gift, loan, use), the Court ruled that it could not be unequivocally concluded that the person had obtained the funds for the acquisition of a residential house and other structures illegally or that he knew that the property in his possession could not be acquired with legal income.
The Court has clarified that legal doctrine obliges to give preference to a law interpretation method that would be less restrictive of the rights and interests of private legal entities and would produce less severe or painful results for these entities and for society as a whole. The identical discrepancy of the assets under ownership alone with the income received does not draw a reasonable conclusion as to the existence of unlawful enrichment.
An Attorney-at-Law of Vilnius Law Firm SPES defended the client’s interests in a dispute regarding compensation for losses upon conclusion of a replacement contract. The client was sued for alleged losses due to non-fulfilment of the contract, as a result of which the claimant had to enter into a replacement contract. An Attorney-at-Law of the Firm p...
An Attorney-at-Law of Vilnius Law Firm SPES successfully represented and defended the interests of client - ex-spouse of the head of the bankrupt company - in litigation with the insolvency administrator of a bankrupt company, who claimed that the client’s real estate purchase transaction was fraudulent because of the subject and sought to direct the debt...
An Attorney-at-Law of Vilnius Law Firm SPES successfully represented and defended the client’s interests in the Supreme Court of Lithuania. The Court of Cassation put an end to the dispute between UAB “Ecoservice” and one of the regional waste management centres. The Court clarified the supplier’s interest in disputing the amount of fund...
The Court ruled on the tenant's obligation to pay rent during the quarantine period. The team of Vilnius Law Firm SPES defended the interests of the client - the company operating the shopping centre - in a dispute with the tenant who evaded the payment of rent and marketing tax. The tenant of the premises argued that it should be exempted from paying the ...
The team of Vilnius Law Firm SPES represented the client in the acquisition of one of the largest shopping centres in Northern Lithuania - 18.500 sq. m. area Panevėžys shopping and entertainment centre “Babilonas”. We are happy with the client development and the opportunity to contribute to their success. More information about the transaction:http...