FEBRUARY 2021

The Court has ruled on lawfulness of the contracting authority’s decision on termination of the procurement procedures.
 
An attorney-at-law of Vilnius law firm SPES managed to prove in court that the Central Contracting Authority, in making the decision to terminate the public procurement procedures, did not violate the requirements of legal acts.
In the present case, the dispute has arisen over the Central Contracting Authority’s decision to terminate the public procurement procedures for purchase of goods which have become unnecessary to the contracting authority. The supplier which was dissatisfied with the decision brought a lawsuit against the indicated decision to the court. The attorney-at-law of the law firm has proved that, in the case in question, the Central Contracting Authority’s decision met the requirement of rational use of the funds applicable to the public procurement which would be definitely violated by the obligation to continue procedures where the need for the procedure has changed imposed on the contracting authority.
Having heard the case, the court has found that as the contracting authority objectively did not have financing and could not continue the procurement procedures, termination of the procurement is the only rational option. The obligation to continue the procurement and purchase the goods the need for which no longer exists, especially, given the lack of funding, would be incompatible with the purpose of the public procurement to conclude a public contract on purchase of the goods necessary for the contracting authority rationally using the allocated funds. Thus, the changed need of the contracting authority with regard to the subject of the procurement was recognized by the court as a circumstance which could not have been foreseen when announcing the procurement and which justified the termination of procurement procedures on the basis of Article 29 of the Law on Public Procurement.
 
We defended the interests of the client who purchased a company’s shares against unreasonable claims for annulment of the shares purchase-sale transaction.
 
An attorney-at-law of Vilnius law firm SPES successfully represented a client that purchased a company’s shares against the claims for annulment of the shares purchase-sale transaction on actio Pauliana grounds.
The attorney-at-law of the law firm has proved that the client was not involved in any unlawful agreements, did not help to conceal the debtor’s property and the shares purchase-sale transaction was consistent with the real intentions and objectives of the parties.
The court has found that the claimant has failed to prove the totally of the conditions of application of the institute of actio Pauliana, namely, has failed to prove unfairness of the parties to the transaction: the shares purchase-sale transaction was concluded because one of the shareholders sought to transfer the shares and withdraw from the company’s management due to disagreements with other shareholders and such transaction is fully  consistent with the business logics and shows that by concluding the transaction the parties have not implemented any concealed unlawful objectives.
 
Victory in the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania: a client of the law firm will not have to comply with the decision of the National Paying Agency under the Ministry of Agriculture on repayment of the funds of the support.

An attorney-at-law of Vilnius law firm SPES successfully defended a client’s interests in the dispute with the National Paying Agency under the Ministry of Agriculture concerning repayment of the funds of the support amounting to EUR 200,000.
The National Paying Agency took a decision on termination of the support agreement and recovery of the funds of the support as it had suspicions that the client of the law firm allegedly failed to comply with the support agreement and failed to carry out rural tourism activities which the client undertook to carry out under the agreement.
By a final court ruling the court declared the sanction imposed by the National Payment Agency unlawful, explained that the sanction must be imposed in accordance with the principles of dissuasion and proportionality and imposition of disproportionate and inadequate sanctions does not comply with the constitutional principle of the legal rule, good faith and reasonableness requirements. The court has explained that even if any infringements in absorption of funds of the support are found and the support agreement is performed, termination of the agreement and recovery of the total amount of the support may be only an exceptional measure; in each particular case, the imposed sanctions must be reasonable and chosen by properly individualising the committed infringement and evaluating the consequences of the infringement.

  • JULY 2021

    The administrative court reinstated the illegally dismissed environmentalist The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court annulled the illegal orders of the Director of the Department of Environmental Protection under the Ministry of Environment regarding the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the head of the Regional Environmental Inspectorate and reins...

  • JUNE 2021

    The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania clarified the principles of pricing municipal waste management services. We represented the client, the organizer of the waste management system, in a dispute with consumers who tried to prove that the municipal waste management fee should be calculated only on the basis of the amount of waste actually delivere...

  • MAY 2021

    The court settled a dispute concerning the unjustified imposition of VAT on the vehicle purchase transaction The lawyer of the Vilnius law firm SPES managed to defend the client’s interests in a dispute with the tax administrator concerning the unjustified imposition of VAT on the vehicle purchase transaction.The client of the firm acquired a vehicle...

  • APRIL 2021

    The court has ruled on the legality of the contracting authority’s decision to terminate the procurement procedure Attorney at Law of Law Firm SPES has managed to prove in court that the decision of the contracting authority to terminate the public procurement procedure was legitimate.Court of Appeal of Lithuania, which examined the case, has clarifi...

  • MARCH 2021

    The Court has clarified the conditions under which an agreement on default interest may be deemed contrary to public order (Article 1.81 of the Civil Code). Attorney at Law of law firm SPES has successfully defended the right of the client (creditor) to claim 0,2% default interest from the debtor as specified in the contract. In the case in question, ...